1. return to his previous employment position with the county district that he was serving as supervisor when the interim term is over?
2. return to his previous employment position with the county district that he was serving as supervisor when the interim term is over if he abstained from any vote concerning the budget of the county?
State law restricts the Mississippi
Ethics Commission to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101
through 25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section
109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, this opinion does not
address the Mississippi laws outside the Commission's jurisdiction nor
the governmental entity's internal rules and regulations.
"No public officer or member of the legislature shall be interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with the state, or any district, county, city, or town thereof, authorized by any law passed or order made by any board of which he may be or may have been a member, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one year after the expiration of such term."
Code Section 254-103 (f)(i)(ii), (g)(i), (h) and (p)(i)(ii)(iii) states:
"(f) 'Contract' means:
(p) 'Public servant' means:
"(2) No public servant shall be interested, directly or indirectly, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one (1) year after the expiration of such term, in any contract with the state, or any district, county, city or town thereof, authorized by any law passed or order made by any board of which he may be or may have been a member.
(3) No public servant shall:
Pertinent facts and circumstances provided
by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and
considered a part of this opinion.
Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.
Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a), cited above, would require that the county employee resign his employment position with the county before accepting the appointment to the board of supervisors.
This finding is supported by the exceptions set forth in the above cited Code Section 25-4- 105(4)(h). This subsection only allows a public servant to be employed by or receive compensation from an authority of the governmental entity other than the authority of the governmental entity of which he or she is a member, officer, employee or agent.
Clearly, the county board of supervisors is the authority of the governmental entity presently employing the public servant.
Constitutional Section 109 and Code Section 25-4-105(2), both cited above, clearly prohibit a board member of a governmental entity from having an interest, directly or indirectly, during his or her term or for one year thereafter in any contract authorized by his or her board. [Emphasis added]
Regarding Issue 1, Constitutional Section 109 and Code Section 25-4-105(2) prohibit the county's re-employment of the interim supervisor within one year of the date that he leaves the board of supervisors.
Regarding Issue 2, the requestor is cautioned to advise the board member that a recusal or an abstention will not prevent a violation of Constitutional Section 109 or Code Section 25-4-105(2). Even without the board member's vote, the authorization by the member's board nonetheless results in a contract in which the board member has a prohibited interest.
The requestor's concern for fairness for those that may choose to serve as public officers on a governing board can best be addressed by the Mississippi Supreme Court's decision in Frazier v. State, 504 So.2d 675 (Miss. 1987). The Court stated, "First, it is clear [Section 109] is to protect the government. It is not a provision to protect individual rights. It is not concerned with whether some individual or class of individuals may suffer from its enforcement. As noted in Noxubee County Hardware Co., supra, the transgression test is intended to be mechanistic and objective, and motives and intentions of persons who violate it are immaterial. Its purpose is to remove any temptation to invade its proscription.
It is also a self-executing section,
and more specific than many, perhaps most, constitutional provisions. It
prohibits an individual having an interest in a contract when he as a public
officer served on the official body which enabled the contract to come
into being. It is that simple. Being self-executing, its provisions cannot
be modified or encroached upon by the Legislature."
Ronald B. Crowe Executive Director