OFFICIAL ADVISORY OPINION NO. 96-l45-E
 
December 6, 1996
This Advisory Opinion concerns the following issue as formulated from facts and/or circumstances furnished by a requestor. The Commission approved this opinion on December 6, 1996, basing its approval solely on the facts and circumstances stated herein.
May a member of a law firm or the law firm simultaneously serve as counsel to a municipal joint action agency and to municipalities or municipal utility commissions contracting with the municipal joint action agency?
State law restricts the Mississippi Ethics Commission to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through 25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, this opinion does not address the Mississippi laws outside the Commission's jurisdiction nor the governmental entity's internal rules and regulations.

The pertinent conflict of interest laws to be considered here are:

"The legislature declares that elective and public office and employment is a public trust and any effort to realize personal gain through official conduct, other than as provided by law, or as a natural consequence of the employment or position, is a violation of that trust. Therefore, public servants shall endeavor to pursue a course of conduct which will not raise suspicion among the public that they are likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of this trust and which will not reflect unfavorably upon the state and local governments."
Code Section 25-4-103(c), (d), (f)(i)(ii), (g)(ii)(v), (h), (1), (m) and (p)(i)(ii)(iii) states:
"(c) 'Business' means any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, holding company, self-employed individual, joint stock company, receivership, trust or other legal entity or undertaking organized for economic gain, a nonprofit corporation or other such entity, association or organization receiving public funds.

(d) 'Business with which he is associated' means any business of which a public servant or his relative is an officer, director, owner, partner, employee or is a holder of more than ten percent (10%) of the fair market value or from which he or his relative derives more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) in annual income or over which such public servant or his relative exercises control.

(f) 'Contract' means:

(i) Any agreement to which the government is a party; or
(ii) Any agreement on behalf of the government which involves the payment of public funds.
(g) 'Governmental' means the state and all political entities thereof; both collectively and separately, including but not limited to:
(ii) Municipalities; and
(v) Any department, agency, board, commission, institution, instrumentality, or legislative or administrative body of the state, counties or municipalities created by statute, ordinance or executive order including all units that expend public funds.
(h) 'Governmental entity' means the state, a county, a municipality or any other separate political subdivision authorized by law to exercise a part of the sovereign power of the state.

(1) 'Pecuniary benefit' means benefit in the form of money, property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain. Expenses associated with social occasions afforded public servants shall not be deemed a pecuniary benefit.

(m) 'Person' means any individual, firm, business, corporation, association, partnership, union or other legal entity, and where appropriate a governmental entity.

(p) 'Public servant' means:

(i) Any elected or appointed official of the government;
(ii) Any officer, director, commissioner, supervisor, chief; head, agent or employee of the government or any agency thereof; or of any public entity created by or under the laws of the State of Mississippi or created by an agency or governmental entity thereof; any of which is funded by public funds or which expends, authorizes or recommends the use of public funds; or
(iii) Any individual who receives a salary, per diem or expenses paid in whole or in part out of funds authorized to be expended by the government."
Code Section 25-4-105(1) and (5) states:

"(1) No public servant shall use his official position to obtain pecuniary benefit for himself other than that compensation provided for by law, or to obtain pecuniary benefit for any relative or any business with which he is associated.

(5) No person may intentionally use or disclose information gained in the course of or by reason of his official position or employment as a public servant in any way that could result in pecuniary benefit for himself; any relative, or any other person, if the information has not been communicated to the public or is not public information."
Pertinent facts and circumstances in the form of the requestor' 5 letter, absent identifying data, are attached hereto and considered a part of this opinion.

Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.

The state conflict of interest laws do not as such prohibit a member of a law firm or a law firm from simultaneously serving as counsel to a municipal joint action agency and to municipalities or municipal utility commissions contracting with the municipal joint action agency.

Notwithstanding the above, the requestor is cautioned to advise the attorney to remain keenly aware of the above cited Code Section 25-4-105(1) and (5).

Code Section 25-4-105(1) prohibits public servants from using their official positions to obtain a pecuniary benefit for themselves, a relative or a business with which they are associated.

To avoid using their official positions to obtain a pecuniary benefit, the public servants must totally and completely recuse themselves from subject matters providing the pecuniary interests.

A total and complete recusal requires that the public servant not only avoid debating, discussing or taking action on the subject matter during the official meeting, but also avoid discussing the subject matter with board members, staff or any other person prior to and after the official meeting. This includes casual comments, as well as detailed discussions, made in person, by telephone or by any other means.

Also in order to properly recuse oneself from a matter, the public servant must leave the room or area where such discussions, considerations and/or actions take place. The minutes of the governing entity's board should state the public servant left the meeting by showing him or her absent for that matter.

Therefore, the attorney should recuse himself from advising the municipal joint action agency's board on any matters that concern or affect other municipalities or municipal utility commissions that the attorney or his law firm represent. Also, the attorney should recuse himself from advising the other municipalities' boards or municipal utility commissions' boards on any matters that concern or affect the municipal joint action agency.

Code Section 25-4-105(5) prohibits a public servant, including a governmental entity's attorney, from using non-public information gained by reason of his or her employment in any way that could provide a pecuniary benefit to the public servant or any other person. A person would include another governmental entity or a law firm.

The issue presented by the requestor also must be viewed as it relates to Code Section 25-4-101, set forth above. This code section sets the tone for the conflict of interest laws as the Legislature's "Declaration of Public Policy." This public policy can be summarized as any circumstance having the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon the state or local government should be closely reviewed by public servants with the intent to reduce or eliminate any suspicion on the part of the public which detracts from the public's trust in state or local government.

Clearly, a member of a law firm or the law firm's simultaneous representation of a joint governmental entity and other governmental entities contracting with the joint governmental entity will create suspicion among the public and reflect unfavorably upon all the governmental entities involved.

Ronald E. Crowe Executive Director