OFFICIAL ADVISORY OPINION NO. 96-045-E
 
 
April 5, 1996
May a county owned community hospital select as its depository a bank that one of the members of the hospital's board of trustees serves as an officer or employee?
    State law restricts the Mississippi Ethics Commission to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through 25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, this opinion does not address the Mississippi laws outside the Commission's jurisdiction nor the governmental entity's internal rules and regulations.
The pertinent conflict of interest laws to be considered here are:
Constitutional Section 109 states:

"No public officer or member of the legislature shall be interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with the state, or any district, county, city, or town thereof, authorized by any law passed or order made by any board of which he may be or may have been a member, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one year after the expiration of such term."

Code Section 25-4-103(g)(v), (h), and (p)(i)(ii)(iii) states:
"(g) 'Governmental' means the state and all political entities thereof, both collectively and separately, including but not limited to:
(v) Any department, agency, board, commission, institution, instrumentality, or legislative or administrative body of the state, counties or municipalities created by statute, ordinance or executive order including all units that expend public funds.
(h) 'Governmental entity' means the state, a county, a municipality or any other separate political subdivision authorized by law to exercise a part of the sovereign power of the state.
(p) 'Public servant' means:
(i) Any elected or appointed official of the government;
(ii) Any officer, director, commissioner, supervisor, chief head, agent or employee of the government or any agency thereof or of any public entity created by or under the laws of the State of Mississippi or created by an agency or governmental entity thereof any of which is funded by public funds or which expends, authorizes or recommends the use of public funds; or
(iii) Any individual who receives a salary, per diem or expenses paid in whole or in part out of funds authorized to be expended by the government."
Code Section 25-4-105(2) states:
"(2) No public servant shall be interested, directly or indirectly, during the term for which he shall have been chosen, or within one (1) year after the expiration of such term, in any contract with the state, or any district, county, city or town thereof authorized by any law passed or order made by any board of which he may be or may have been a member."
    Pertinent facts and circumstances provided by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and considered a part of this opinion.
I have recently been appointed to the Board of Trustees of a county owned community hospital by the County Board of Supervisors. At the first meeting I attended, the board was considering the selection of a depository.
Having previously served on this board and having been involved in the audit of public entities, it was my understanding that for the board to select a depository where a member was an officer would be in violation of the rulings of the Ethics Commission.
The question is if one of the members of the hospital board is an officer at a local depository, may the hospital board choose that institution as its depository?
Would the answer be different if the member were merely an employee and not an officer?
    Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.

    The hospital board of trustees' selection of a bank as its depository that is the employer of a member of the hospital board would be prohibited by the above cited Constitutional Section 109 and Code Section 25-4-105(2). It would not matter whether the trustee was serving as an officer or employee of the bank.

    The requestor is cautioned to advise the board member that a recusal or an abstention will not prevent a violation of Constitutional Section 109 or Code Section 25-4-105(2). Even without the board member's vote, the authorization by the member's board nonetheless results in a contract in which the board member has a prohibited interest.
 
 
 

Ronald E. Crowe Executive Director