This Advisory Opinion concerns the following issues as formulated from facts and/or circumstances furnished by a requestor. The opinion is based solely on the facts and circumstances as stated below and was approved by the Commission on November 10, 1995.
Issue 1. 1. May a state employee serve as a council member for a municipality?
Issue 2. What actions should a council member take in regard to work performed for or funding supplied to the municipality by the state agency employing the council memberThe Mississippi Ethics Commission is restricted to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through 25-4-119,1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, Mississippi laws outside the jurisdiction of the Commission and internal rules and regulations of the local governmental entity are not addressed by this opinion.
Pertinent facts and circumstances provided by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and considered a part of this opinion.
I am requesting an official opinion to the following questions:
1. May a state employee serve as a councilman for a municipality?
2. While serving as a councilman for a municipality, what action should I take concerning any work performed by my employer/state agency or find 5 supplied by my employer/state agency within the city limits.The pertinent conflict of interest laws to be considered here are:
Code Section 25-4-101 states:
"The legislature declares that elective and public office and employment is a public trust and any effort to realize personal gain through official conduct, other than as provided by law, or as a natural consequence of the employment or position, is a violation of that trust. Therefore, public servants shall endeavor to pursue a course of conduct which will not raise suspicion among the public that they are likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of this trust and which will not reflect unfavorably upon the state and local governments."
Code Section 25-4-103(g)(ii)(v), (h), (1) and (p)(i)(ii)(iii) states:
"(g) 'Governmental' means the state and all political entities thereof, both collectively and separately, including but not limited to:
(ii) Municipalities; and
(v) Any department, agency, board, commission, institution, instrumentality, or legislative or administrative body of the state, counties or municipalities created by statute, ordinance or executive order including all units that expend public funds.
(h) 'Governmental entity' means the state, a county, a municipality or any other separate political subdivision authorized by law to exercise a part of the sovereign power of the state.
(I) 'Pecuniary benefit' means benefit in the form of money, property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain. Expenses associated with social occasions afforded public servants shall not be deemed a pecuniary benefit.
(p) 'Public servant' means:
(i) Any elected or appointed official of government;
(ii) Any officer, director, commissioner, supervisor, chief, head, agent or employee of the government or any agency thereof, or of any public entity created by or under the laws of the State of Mississippi or created by an agency or governmental entity thereof, any of which is funded by public funds or which expends, authorizes or recommends the use of public funds; or
(iii) Any individual who receives a salary, per diem or expenses paid in whole or in part out of funds authorized to be expended by the government."
Code Section 25-4-105(1) states:
"(1) No public servant shall use his official position to obtain pecuniary benefit for himself other than that compensation provided by law, or to obtain pecuniary benefit for any relative or any business with which he is associated."The Commission formally adopts Advisory Opinion No. 93-022-E in response to this request and by attachment incorporates it into this opinion.
Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.
Issue 1. As set forth in the attached opinion, a state employee serving as a municipal council member is not as such prohibited by the conflict of interest laws.
Issue 2. Notwithstanding the above, a council member should recuse himself or herself from any matter coming before the municipal council that involves the council member's state agency employer.
Code Section 25-4-101, cited above, sets the tone for the conflict of interest laws as it is the Legislature's "Declaration of Public Policy." This public policy can be summarized as any circumstance having the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon the state or local government should be closely reviewed by public servants with the intent to reduce or eliminate any suspicion on the part of the public which detracts from the public's trust in state or local government.
Code Section 25-4-105(1), cited above, prohibits public servants from using their official positions to obtain a pecuniary benefit for themselves, a relative or a business with which they are associated.
The council member should totally and completely recuse himself or herself in order to avoid an appearance of impropriety as set forth in Code Section 25-4-101 or to avoid using his or her official position to obtain a pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Code Section 25-4-105(1). In order to properly recuse oneself from a matter, the public servant must leave the room or area where such discussions, considerations and/or actions take place. The minutes of the governing entity's board should state the public servant left the meeting by showing him or her absent for that matter.
A total and complete recusal requires that the public servant not only avoid debating, discussing or taking action on the subject matter during an official meeting, but also avoid discussing the subject matter with board members, staff, employees or any other person prior to and after the official meeting. This includes casual comments, as well as detailed discussions, made in person, by telephone or by any other means.
An abstention is a vote with the majority of the governing
entity's board and therefore does not qualify as a recusal.