The Mississippi Ethics Commission is
restricted to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through
25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109,
Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, Mississippi laws outside the
jurisdiction of the Commission and internal rules and regulations of the
local governmental entity are not addressed by this opinion.
(i) Any agreement to which the government is a party; or
(ii) Any agreement on behalf of the government which involves the payment of public funds.
(i) Counties; and
(v) Any department, agency, board, commission, institution, instrumentality, or legislative or administrative body of the state, counties or municipalities created by statute, ordinance or executive order including all units that expend public funds.
(i) Ownership of any interest of less than ten percent (10%) in a business where the aggregate annual net income to the public servant therefrom is less than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00);
(ii) Ownership of any interest of less than two percent (2%) in a business where the aggregate annual net income to the public servant therefrom is less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00).
(i) Any elected or appointed official of the government;
(ii) Any officer, director, commissioner, supervisor, chief, head, agent or employee of the government or any agency thereof, or of any public entity created by or under the laws of the State of Mississippi or created by an agency or governmental entity thereof, any of which is funded by public funds or which expends, authorizes or recommends the use of public funds; or
('Ii) Any individual who receives a salary, per diem or expenses paid in whole or in part out of funds authorized to be expended by the government.
Pertinent facts and circumstances provided by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and considered part of this opinion.(a) Be a contractor, subcontractor or vendor with the governmental entity of which he is a member, officer, employee or agent, other than in his contract of employment, or have a material financial interest in any business, which is a contractor, subcontractor or vendor with the governmental entity of which he is a member, officer, employee or agent."
In addition to the above stated facts, the Commission's staff was advised that the individual was in a position commonly referred to as a "road employee." The individual's employment duties consisted primarily of operating county equipment The individual's construction company was paid on an invoice basis at a rate of $100.00 an hour. The invoices did not specify the related project nor type work performed.
Based solely on the facts and circumstances provided herein, the Commission presents the following conclusions and reasons.
During the specified time period, September 1, 1992 through February 28, 1993, the contract between the county and the employee's construction company was not prohibited by the above cited Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a).
Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a), as set forth above, prohibits a contract between an "employee" and the employer county since the effective date of its amendment on July 1, 1994.
However, prior to the amendment, the Mississippi Supreme Court held in Attorney General Mike Moore and the Mississippi Ethics Commission et rel Chickasaw County Mississippi v. Durwood McCullough, 633 So.2d 421 Miss. 1993), that "employee is not a classification synonymous with 'member'."
Therefore, Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a)
prohibited only board members from being
contractors, subcontractors or vendors with their governmental
entity up to and until July 1, 1994.
All members, officers, employees or agents are prohibited from being contractors, subcontracts or vendors with their governmental entity from an a er July 1, 1994.
The contract between the county and the employee's construction company was not prohibited by the above cited Code Section 254-105(2).
Code Section 25-4-105(2) referred to in the requestor's correspondence is applicable only to public servants that also are members of the board which authorizes a contract. In this instance the public servant was not a member of the authorizing board. The public servant is a county "road employee" and the authorizing board is the "county board supervisors."
Code Section 25-4-105(1), cited above, prohibits public servants from using their official positions to obtain a pecuniary benefit for themselves, a relative or a business with which they are associated.
In order to avoid using their official positions to obtain a pecuniary benefit, the public servants must totally and completely recuse themselves from subject matters providing the pecuniary interests.
A total and complete recusal requires that the public servant not only avoid debating, discussing, or taking action on the subject matter during an official meeting, but also avoid discussing the subject matter with board members, other employees or any other person prior to and after an official meeting. This includes casual comments, as well as detail discussions, made in person, by telephone or by any other means.
In fact, the public servant should
not be present in the room or area where the governing authority is discussing,
considering and/or acting on the subject matter. The minutes of the governing
authority should reflect the absence of the public servant during the meeting(s)
in which the subject matter is addressed.
Ronald E. Crowe Executive Director