OFFICIAL ADVISORY OPINION NO. 02-014-E

March 1, 2002

This Advisory Opinion concerns the following issue as formulated from facts and/or circumstances fumished by a requestor. The Commission approved this opinion on March 1, 2002, basing its approval solely on the facts and circumstances stated herein.

State law restricts the Mississippi Ethics Commission to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through 25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, this opinion does not address the Mississippi laws outside the Commission's jurisdiction nor the governmental entity's intemal rules and regulations.

The pertinent conflict of interest laws to be considered here are:

Code Section 25-4-101 states:

Pertinent facts and circumstances provided by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and considered a part of this opinion. Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.

It is not such a violation of the state conflict of interest laws for a state trooper to be employed as a county civil defense director.

The state conflict of interest laws do not as such prohibit a public servant, including a state trooper, from being employed by two totally separate governments, in this instance, the state and a county. The state trooper is currently an employee of the state of Mississippi seeking employment with a county authority, therefore, two separate govemmental entities are involved.

Notwithstanding the above, the requestor as a state trooper must remain keenly aware of the above cited Code Section 25-4-105(1) and Code Section 25-4-101.

Code Section 25-4-105(1) prohibits a public servant, including a state trooper, from using his official position to obtain a pecuniary benefit for himself or a business with which he is associated.

However, it is not a violation of Code Section 25-4-105(1) when a public servant uses for pecuniary gain the general knowledge in a particular field that he is required to have in order to hold his public employment position. It is a violation when a public servant uses specific knowledge that is available to him only because of his public employment to obtain a pecuniary benefit. Also, it is a violation when a public servant uses his public employer's equipment, facilities or other resources to obtain a pecuniary benefit.

The issue presented by the requestor must be viewed as it relates to Code Section 25-4-101, set forth above. This code section sets the tone for the conflict of interest laws as the Legislature's "Declaration of Public Policy." This public policy can be summarized as any circumstance having the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon the state or local government should be closely reviewed by public servants with the intent to reduce or eliminate any suspicion on the part of the public which detracts from the public's trust in state or local government.

Clearly, a state trooper contracting with divisions of a county government that the state trooper is directly or indirectly involved with through his state employment has the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon his state employer.

Therefore, a state trooper should avoid contracting with any division of a county government that he is directly or indirectly involved with through his state employment in order to fully comply with the public policy mandate set forth in Code Section 25-4-101.

As for the state trooper's participation in the PERS system as the county civil defense director, PERS should be directly consulted to determine the state trooper's eligibility.

Scott Rankin

Executive Director