OFFICIAL ADVISORY OPINION NO. 02-013-E

March 1, 2002

This Advisory Opinion concerns the following issue as formulated from facts and/or circumstances furnished by a requestor. The Commission approved this opinion on March 1, 2002, basing its approval solely on the facts and circumstances stated herein.

State law restricts the Mississippi Ethics Commission to interpreting and issuing opinions on Sections 25-4-101 through 25-4-119, 1972 Mississippi Code Annotated and Article IV, Section 109, Mississippi Constitution of 1890. Therefore, this opinion does not address the Mississippi laws outside the Commission's jurisdiction nor the governmental entity's internal rules and regulations.

The pertinent conflict of interest laws to be considered here are:

Code Section 25-4-101 states:

Pertinent facts and circumstances provided by the requestor, absent identifying data, are set forth as follows and considered a part of this opinion. Based solely on the facts and circumstances presented by the requestor, the Commission's opinion is as follows.

The requestor's facts state that a collection business owned by the requestor and/or the requestor' s spouse will not do business with the justice court that the requestor serves as justice court clerk. Therefore, it is not a violation of the state conflict of interest laws for a collection business owned by ajustice court clerk and/or the clerk's spouse to do business with counties and cities that do not employ the justice court clerk.

Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a), cited above, does prohibit a public servant from having a material financial interest in a business that is a contractor, subcontractor or vendor with the governmental entity that the public servant serves as a member, an officer, an employee or an agent.

The above cited Code Section 25-4-103(c), in part, defines a business as any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, holding company, self-employed individual, joint stock company, receivership, trust or other legal entity or undertaking organized for economic gain.

The above cited Code Section 25-4-103(k) defines a material financial interest as a personal and pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, accruing to a public servant or spouse, either individually or in combination with each other.

Therefore, Code Section 25-4-105(3)(a) prohibits a company owned by ajustice court clerk, or her spouse, from doing business with the justice court the justice court clerk is appointed to serve.

Code Section 25-4-105(l), cited above, prohibits a public servant, including a justice court clerk, from using his or her official position to obtain a pecuniary benefit for a business with which he or she, or a relative is associated. Emphasizing another reason the justice court clerk nor her spouse could contract with the justice court employing the clerk.

It is the Commission's opinion that it would be impossible for a justice court clerk to not select, review or approve the need of a contractor to perform such services for the justice court; supervise, monitor and evaluate a contractor performing such services for the justice court; and, have authority over the invoice or payment processes pertaining to a contractor performing such services for the justice court employing the clerk. Therefore, it would be impossible for a collection business owned by a justice court clerk and/or spouse to contract with the county justice court that employs the clerk without violating Code Section 25-4-105(1).

Additionally, Code Section 25-4-101, set forth above, sets the tone for the conflict of interest laws as the Legislature's "Declaration of Public Policy." This public policy can be summarized as any circumstance having the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon the state or local government should be closely reviewed by public servants with the intent to reduce or eliminate any suspicion on the part of the public which detracts from the public's trust in state or local government.

Clearly, a collection business owned by a justice court clerk and/or spouse contracting to collect unpaid delinquent case balances for the justice court the clerk services has the potential of creating suspicion among the public and reflecting unfavorably upon county justice court. Therefore, such a circumstances should be avoided to fully comply with the public policy mandate set forth in Code Section 25-4-101.

In summary, the state conflict of interest laws do not prohibit a justice court clerk and/or her spouse from operating a collection agency that collects unpaid delinquent case balances for justice courts and municipal courts, as long as their business excludes the justice court for which the court clerk currently works.

Scott Rankin

Executive Director